Is Simon Dorante-Day the love child of Charles and Camilla? Bio and DNA test results from Wikipedia|All Social Updates

Is Simon Dorante-Day the love child of Charles and Camilla? Bio and DNA test results from Wikipedia

Simon Dorante-Day, who lives in Queensland, Australia, says he is the secret child of King Charles III and Camilla. He’s been saying that for years. Now that the Queen has passed away, he has revealed some new information about the DNA paternity test.

Simon Dorante Day may not be as popular as Camilla, Prince Charles or Queen Elizabeth II. But its shocking claims about King Charles III. have been making headlines around the world for years.

Dorante-Day, who is said to be the secret love child of Prince Charles III. and Camilla Is recently spoke out about his DNA paternity case.

Simon has long said he is related to the royal family. In an interview with Australian newspaper 7NEWS, Simon defended his claims.

After the death of Queen Elizabeth II, he added a new twist to his story.

Simon Dorante-Day Wikipedia: His Family Background

Simon Dorante-Day was born in Gosport, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. He grew up in Queensland. Karen and David Day, who lived nearby, took him in when he was eight months old.

According to 7news, his two adopted grandparents, Winifred and Ernest Bowden, worked in the royal households of the Queen and Prince Philip. Ernest Bowden was presented with an Imperial Service Award.

Dorante Research Day reveals that Charles and Camilla first became close in 1965. He says Charles was brought to Australia and that Camilla then disappeared from social media in the UK for at least nine months, which was before Charles was born.

One historian also says that the hospital listed as the place of birth on his birth certificate had no babies in the ten years before he was born.

Simon Dorante-Day DNA test results: Is he Charles and Camilla’s love child?

Simon Dorante-Day is considered the secret love child of Prince Charles III and Camila. His DNA paternity case has now been made public.

He had previously made headlines with his statements, which he said were the result of decades of research.

He’s been telling people for a long time that he’s Charles and Camilla’s son. Dorante-Day says his adoptive grandmother worked for Queen Elizabeth. He said she told him on her deathbed that Charles and Camilla were his real parents.

Since he was born in 1966, he was probably conceived before Charles and Diana’s wedding. Many people think Charles and Camilla met in 1970, but Dorante-Day says that’s not true.

Dorante-Day also believes that Charles and Camilla gave him to the staff for them to raise. He also said how sad he was to lose his “grandmother” after the death of Queen Elizabeth.

He had also previously said that he had attempted to write a letter to the Queen hoping she would reply, but that his attempt had failed.

Dorante-Day has since said he wants Charles and Camilla’s DNA tested in court. In an interview with 7News, he said he had spoken to lawyers about filing a lawsuit against the king.

Dorante-Day had also tried to bring the case to court, but had failed. He thinks it will be different this time.

Simon Dorante day

How old is Simon Dorante-Day’s age?

In 2022 Simon Dornte-Day will be 56 years old. He was born on April 5, 1966 in Gosport, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

He’s spent more than ten years proving he’s a heir apparent to the British throne and a Blueblood.

It is interesting that he started claiming it long before Charles III. became king.

Simon Dorante-Day strikes back

1. Debate on grandfather’s award

Dorante-Day claimed his grandfather, Ernest Bowlden, was awarded an Imperial Service Medal and that his adoptive grandparents, Winifred and Ernest Bowlden, both worked for the Queen and Prince Philip.

Dorante-Day first found out about his royal parents from his grandma Winifred.

My grandmother and I were very close and she often reminded me that I was Camilla and Charles’ child, the man explained.

She didn’t just imply it; she was in front with me. She was always quite protective because she was concerned for my safety and the consequences if it came out.

However, presenter Philip Schofield and royal biographer Robert Jobson criticized Dorante-Day in a recent television interview in the UK, claiming there was no evidence Ernest Bowlden was ever awarded an Imperial Service Medal.

However, Dorante-Day has provided evidence in the form of a photograph of the award on display at his adoptive parents’ home.

Ernest Bowlden was honored for his 25 years of service to the English prison system.

After working as a gardener on one of the Queen’s estates, where he first met his future wife Winifred, a cook to Her Majesty, he entered prison service.

Ernest Bowlden was included on the 1963 list of honorees, according to government documents of the day.

According to Dorante-Day, “I found it in the archives of the London Gazette, clearly stated in black and white.”

It’s not hard to find, as my Facebook fans have also noticed.

There’s no doubt about that because the date on the price corner, which came from my adoptive mother Karen Day’s house, matches the date on the newspaper article.

Charles and Camilla’s ‘Aussie son’ is rocked by new Charlotte evidence.

2. When Charles and Camilla first met

For many years, royal writers and correspondents have speculated wildly about the exact day Charles and Camilla first met.

Four different years, from 1969 to 1972, have been cited in various articles and books as the couple’s “first meeting.”

Last week, New Zealand radio stations Jono and Ben were told by The Hits by British Royalty writer Gavin Gray that they “don’t believe” Charles and Camilla “were together” when Dorante-Day was conceived.

However, Dorante-Day feels there is enough reason to believe they may have met much earlier.

According to Dorante-Day, “The fact that royal biographers and novelists have provided such radically different stories about their first encounter proves that none of them really know what they are talking about.”

“This ‘first meeting’ was recorded in 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972, so they’re not just a day or a month apart.

“What we do know is that Camilla was introduced to London society in March 1965. Charles was spotted in London in 1965 and they frequented the same high society areas.

So it stands to reason that they would have met in early 1965 after their induction into society.

“Charles also visited Camilla’s hometown in 1963 while she was enrolled at a Swiss high school. They therefore lived in the same place in 1963 and took part in the London social scene in 1965.

There is ample reason to believe that this first encounter did not take place between 1969 and 1972.

3. Camilla “didn’t appear to be pregnant” in March 1965.

Gavin Grey, a UK royal correspondent, also revealed to New Zealand radio DJs Jono and Ben that Camilla appears to have a flat stomach in pictures taken in March 1965.

He told radio hosts: “Actually, there are pictures showing her going to a debutantes ball in London on March 25, 1965, which is about the time he’s talking about, and she’s quite obviously not pregnant.

And she appears in various photographs taken throughout 1965. I’m not saying he’s wrong; there are only elements that impede his progress of events.

However, Dorante-Day said he was “disappointed” by the “inaccurate” remark.

He added, “You have to do the math.”

“Since I was born in April 1966, my conception must have occurred around July 1965, minus nine months.

So why are they assuming that Camilla appears to be pregnant in March 1965? I believe you will also discover the debutante ball, which took place on her birthday in July rather than March.

“My research has revealed that Camilla disappeared from the social scene between August 1965 and June 1966, around the time she would have carried me,” he continued.

And Charles was deported to Australia in December 1965 until I was born in April 1966.

4. Why don’t you just get a DNA test done?

In interviews and on social media, critics often ask Dorante-Day why he didn’t take a DNA test to back up his claims of being a prince, Dorante-Day said.

“As this is obviously what I’ve worked so hard to achieve, it always amuses me when people ask me that,” he told 7NEWS.com.au.

“I’ve been fighting in court for three years to get Charles and Camilla to agree to a DNA test. Because media coverage of family court proceedings is illegal in Australia, my actions have not been widely publicized.

A new connection is discovered between Prince Andrew and Charles and Camilla’s ‘Aussie son’
But long as the court case is, I’m not giving up. My case was referred back to the Family Court by the Australian High Court when I petitioned them and they will do so again in the coming months.

“I am also seeking legal advice in the UK so I can take my fight abroad.

Given that I ultimately have to go to court, I’m not interested in doing DNA testing on other distant royals. I want this to be dealt with properly in court.

5. Family resemblance

According to Dorante-Day, he has also been criticized by people for pictures showing similarities between himself, his children and members of the royal family.

They think this is the gist of my thesis and that I have no other research to back up my claims, he said.

However, they are so far from the truth. I’ve been very wary of learning the truth ever since my grandmother told me that Charles and Camilla were my parents.

“I never just assumed it had to be true because she said so. Without doubt. I did my own research, talked to historians and read documents. Every path I took brought me back to Charles and Camilla.

“But it was another piece of the puzzle when my children were born and my wife Elvianna and I saw the parallels. However, as I frequently point out, there are still many missing pieces.

A recent photo comparison between Meriam, Dorante Day’s youngest child, and Prince Charlotte has sparked a lot of curiosity lately, according to Dorante-Day.

He remarked, “I’ve never seen a reaction like this on Facebook. “I just uploaded a picture of Meriam to celebrate her birthday and hundreds of people said they couldn’t believe how similar she looked to Princess Charlotte.”

But it’s important to remember that while DNA is the only conclusive evidence, courts still consider facial and skeletal similarities when determining paternity.

“Facial features, structure, neck, ears and posture can all be considered.”