The Queen refused Meghan Markle’s scandalous wedding tiara: report

#tiaragate Meghan Markle reappears in the news.

While the 41-year-old Duchess of Sussex wore a stunning diamond headdress to her wedding to Prince Harry in 2018, it was rumored over the years that Queen Mary’s Diamond Bandeau was not actually her first choice – and Queen Elizabeth II had to give up her favorite diamond. to prevent controversy.

In the book “The Battle of the Brothers,” royal biographer Robert Lacey wrote that Markle’s choice was “attached to the scandal.” behind the express.

“Unconfirmed by the palace – but not denied – we were told that the Queen felt she had to say no to Meghan’s first choice,” said the author.

The tiara in question was “a beautiful emerald green headdress said to be” of Russian origin “.”

Adding that “it was a code for a sensitive origin,” the author said the mysterious tiara “was one of those that fell into Windsor’s hands through” undefined “, not to say, dubious channels – and at an undisclosed price – following the Russian Revolution. .

In 1918, the entire Russian imperial family – including Tsar Nicholas II, a similar cousin of the English King George V – was murdered, and some jewels from the Romanovs eventually ended up in Britain.

“There was a scandal attached,” Lacey said of an unknown Russian article, continuing in the book that media speculation “about which tsarist princess wore the tiara and how she was murdered” would not cast the palace or Meghan in a positive light. light.

The story of the tiara Markle wore at a wedding has sentimental ties to Queen Elizabeth and “will likely be worth at least £ 2 million”, Max Stone of a leading British jeweler Steven Stone says Page Six Style.

The bandeau headdress “belongs to Queen Mary who married King George V and is Queen Elizabeth’s grandmother,” Stone said, adding that “the center stone featured in the tiara ands actually a brooch of 10 diamonds that Mary of Teck received as a wedding gift from Lincoln County in 1893. “

The jewelry expert added that the tiara was created in 1937 to show off the shining brooch.

Regarding the drama, reporter Dan Wooton endorsed Lacey’s claims: writing for the sun in 2018 (two years before the publication of Brothers) that a source told him, “Meghan had her heart set on that emerald tiara and Prince Harry hit the roof when they were told he couldn’t wear it.”

Although Lacey agreed that Harry “became furious” when his future wife was told she could not wear the tiara, it seems – as former Queen Elizabeth’s once famous in the Sussexes statement – that “memories may differ.”

In a video for the 2019 exhibition showing her wedding dress and jewelry, Markle herself said that she “was lucky to have chosen this gorgeous Art Deco bandeau tiara.” for Harper’s Bazaar, adding, “it was just perfect because it was so clear and simple.” Prince Harry also interjected that the song “looked its best”.

To wrap up the alleged tiara seizure, royal jewelry expert Lauren Kiehn of Court jeweler says Page Six Style that audiences “will never really know exactly how the tiara selection process went because so much information about the royal jewels is kept secret.”

Contemplating the unknown, green piece in question, royal blogger wrote in the article 2020 that “in the end, it is quite possible that there is an emerald tiara in the vaults that we do not know about.”

At the end of the day, Kiehna tells us that “the exact contents of the deceased queen’s personal collection, including the number of tiaras she had and what stones, including emeralds and other green gems,” is ultimately a mystery.

Even if it really wasn’t her first pick, royal fans may agree that Meghan’s wedding tiara was a stunning look for a spring bride.